ZeroClaw 2026 H1 Roadmap Team Meeting Minutes
Meeting Date: 2026-02-28 Attendees: Architect, Security Lead, Product Owner, DevOps Lead Location: ZeroClaw Development Team Meeting Room Author: ZeroClaw Team
1. Meeting Overview
This meeting was held to discuss ZeroClaw’s 2026 first-half development direction and establish roadmaps and priorities for each area.
1.1 Agenda
- Multi-agent architecture development direction
- Security enhancement and compliance response
- Product competitiveness enhancement and UX improvement
- DevOps and infrastructure advancement
- Comprehensive roadmap and priority agreement
2. Architecture Development Discussion
2.1 Architect Statement
“ZeroClaw has completed Phase 1 (in-process delegation) and is currently implementing Phase 2 (file-based multi-agent). The following technical goals need to be achieved in the first half of 2026.”
2.1.1 Multi-Agent Orchestration Advancement
Proposals:
- Implement DAG-based workflow execution engine
- Support sequential/parallel/conditional/loop execution patterns
- Improve agent task distribution algorithm
Priority: High (P1)
// Proposed workflow structure
pub struct Workflow {
pub id: String,
pub nodes: Vec<WorkflowNode>,
pub edges: Vec<WorkflowEdge>,
pub start_node: String,
pub end_nodes: Vec<String>,
pub error_handling: ErrorHandlingPolicy,
}
2.1.2 IPC Communication Protocol Improvement
Proposals:
- Transition from stdout-based communication to structured IPC
- Support multiple transport layers: Unix Socket, gRPC, WebSocket
- Optimize message serialization (JSON → MessagePack/CBOR)
Priority: Medium (P2)
2.1.3 Extensibility and Modularization
Proposals:
- Consider plugin architecture introduction
- Implement Wasm execution mode (enhanced sandboxing)
- Provide external agent registration API
Priority: Low (P3)
2.1.4 Performance Optimization
Proposals:
- Zero-copy message passing
- Connection pooling and caching strategies
- Async I/O optimization
Priority: Medium (P2)
2.2 Discussion
Security Lead:
“Security channels must be applied first when improving IPC protocol. Encryption and authentication for inter-agent communication are needed.”
Product Owner:
“From a user perspective, agent definitions should be more intuitive. Let’s also consider simplifying the YAML schema.”
DevOps Lead:
“Performance optimization work should proceed in parallel with observability improvement. Metrics collection must be secured first to measure optimization effects.”
3. Security Development Discussion
3.1 Security Lead Statement
“ZeroClaw already has a strong security foundation, but there are areas that need improvement from an OWASP Top 10 perspective. Sandbox isolation and audit logging enhancement are particularly urgent.”
3.1.1 Sandbox Enhancement
Current Issues:
- Docker sandbox:
--read-only,--cap-drop, seccomp not applied - Firejail: Network isolation not applied (
--net=nonemissing)
Proposals:
// Docker hardened profile
docker_cmd.args([
"run", "--rm",
"--read-only",
"--security-opt", "no-new-privileges",
"--cap-drop", "ALL",
"--network", "none",
"--memory", "256m",
"--pids-limit", "64",
]);
Priority: High (P1)
3.1.2 Audit Logging Enhancement
Proposals:
- Introduce Log Signing to prevent tampering
- Real-time security alert webhook integration
- Prometheus metrics exposure
Priority: Medium (P2)
3.1.3 SSRF Defense
Proposals:
- Enforce HTTPS for external requests
- Block private IP ranges
- Strengthen domain allowlist validation
Priority: Medium (P2)
3.1.4 TOCTOU Vulnerability Fix
Proposals:
- Perform path validation and normalization atomically
- Prevent symbolic link race conditions
Priority: High (P1)
3.2 Discussion
Architect:
“Sandbox enhancement can provide stronger isolation when linked with Wasm execution mode.”
DevOps Lead:
“Prometheus metrics can greatly improve operational visibility when integrated with Grafana dashboards.”
Product Owner:
“Ensure that security enhancements don’t degrade user experience. Defaults should be secure while advanced users can configure flexibly.”
4. Product Development Discussion
4.1 Product Owner Statement
“ZeroClaw’s core values are ‘high performance’, ’extensibility’, and ‘security’. In the first half of 2026, we need to strengthen these while improving user experience.”
4.1.1 User Experience Improvement
CLI Improvements:
- Improve
zeroclaw agent listoutput (table format) - Interactive agent execution mode
- Progress visualization
Configuration Simplification:
- Simplify agent definition YAML schema
- Provide sensible defaults
- Improve configuration validation and error messages
Priority: High (P1)
4.1.2 Documentation and Onboarding Enhancement
Proposals:
- Improve Quickstart guide
- Auto-generate API reference documentation
- Expand example scenarios
- Multi-language documentation (Korean, Japanese, Chinese)
Priority: Medium (P2)
4.1.3 Community Growth Strategy
Proposals:
- Improve CONTRIBUTING.md
- Label good first issues
- Publish regular release notes
- Discord/Slack community channels
Priority: Medium (P2)
4.1.4 Differentiation Points Enhancement
Proposals:
- Strengthen hardware peripheral support (STM32, RPi)
- Specialized domain agent templates
- Publish performance benchmarks
Priority: Low (P3)
4.2 Discussion
Architect:
“CLI improvement is important from an ergonomics perspective. Let’s also consider upgrading from structopt to clap 4.x.”
Security Lead:
“When writing multi-language documentation, accurate translation of security-related content is important. I recommend creating a terminology glossary first.”
DevOps Lead:
“For community channels, starting with GitHub Discussions is a good approach. It can be started without separate infrastructure.”
5. DevOps Development Discussion
5.1 DevOps Lead Statement
“We need to advance CI/CD pipelines and monitoring systems for stable deployment and operation.”
5.1.1 CI/CD Pipeline Advancement
Current Status:
- GitHub Actions-based CI
- Automated cargo fmt, clippy, test
- Docker build
Proposals:
- Integrate cargo audit (vulnerability scanning)
- Cross-platform build (Linux, macOS, Windows)
- Release automation (cargo-release)
- Pre-deployment smoke tests
Priority: High (P1)
# Proposed CI workflow
- name: Security audit
run: cargo audit
- name: Cross-platform build
strategy:
matrix:
os: [ubuntu-latest, macos-latest, windows-latest]
runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }}
5.1.2 Monitoring and Observability
Proposals:
- Prometheus metrics endpoint
- Grafana dashboard templates
- Distributed tracing (OpenTelemetry)
- Log aggregation (ELK/Loki)
Priority: Medium (P2)
5.1.3 Deployment Automation and Rollback
Proposals:
- Blue-Green deployment support
- Automatic rollback threshold settings
- Canary release options
Priority: Medium (P2)
5.1.4 Development Environment Improvement
Proposals:
- devcontainer configuration
- Automatic git hooks setup
- Development configuration profiles
Priority: Low (P3)
5.2 Discussion
Architect:
“OpenTelemetry integration is essential for multi-agent tracing. Inter-agent call chains must be visualizable.”
Security Lead:
“cargo audit must be included in CI. It’s also good to add dependency license checks.”
Product Owner:
“devcontainer will be very helpful for new contributor onboarding. We can raise its priority.”
6. Comprehensive Roadmap and Priorities
6.1 2026 First Half Roadmap
Q1 (March-April)
| Item | Owner | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| Docker/Firejail sandbox enhancement | Security | P1 |
| TOCTOU vulnerability fix | Security | P1 |
| CI/CD security scan integration | DevOps | P1 |
| CLI improvement and UX enhancement | Product | P1 |
| DAG-based workflow engine | Architect | P1 |
Q2 (May-June)
| Item | Owner | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| IPC communication protocol improvement | Architect | P2 |
| Audit logging enhancement | Security | P2 |
| SSRF defense implementation | Security | P2 |
| Prometheus metrics exposure | DevOps | P2 |
| Documentation and onboarding improvement | Product | P2 |
| Community infrastructure building | Product | P2 |
6.2 Agreed Principles
- Security First: All new features must go through security review
- Gradual Deployment: Large changes are rolled out in stages
- Rollback Capable: All changes must be easily rollbackable
- Documentation Sync: Documentation updates required when features change
- Test Coverage: Tests required for new code
6.3 Risks and Responses
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Response |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbox compatibility issues | Medium | High | Implement fallback mechanism |
| Performance regression | Low | Medium | Automate benchmarks |
| Dependency vulnerabilities | Medium | High | Automate cargo audit |
| Poor documentation | High | Medium | Require documentation PRs |
7. Conclusion and Next Steps
7.1 Meeting Conclusions
- Architecture: Prioritize multi-agent orchestration advancement
- Security: Immediately start sandbox enhancement and TOCTOU fix
- Product: Improve user experience through CLI UX improvement
- DevOps: Build CI/CD security enhancement and monitoring foundation
7.2 Action Items
| # | Item | Owner | Due Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Apply Docker sandbox security profile | Security Lead | 2026-03-07 |
| 2 | Fix TOCTOU path validation | Security Lead | 2026-03-10 |
| 3 | Integrate CI cargo audit | DevOps Lead | 2026-03-05 |
| 4 | Improve CLI agent list | Product Owner | 2026-03-12 |
| 5 | Workflow engine design document | Architect | 2026-03-15 |
7.3 Next Meeting Schedule
- Date: 2026-03-14 10:00
- Agenda: Q1 progress review and Q2 detailed planning
Appendix: Reference Documents
docs/project/multi-agent-architecture-design.md- Multi-agent architecture designdocs/project/multi-agent-communication-protocols.md- Communication protocol designdocs/security/security-improvements.md- Security improvement reportCLAUDE.md- Engineering protocol
Meeting Minutes Date: 2026-02-28 Approved By: ZeroClaw Team Lead Distribution: ZeroClaw Development Team
Korean Version: 한국어 버전